Oil Well Supply Co. v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
MOISE, Justice.
The question herein presented for decision is res nova in Louisiana. There is no controversial issue of fact and the points involved being identical, these suits were consolidated.
Plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant the full amount of the extended term insurance on three policies on the life of Alfred B. Irion. The Oil Well Supply Company is the assignee of two of these policies and the wife and daughter of the deceased are the beneficiaries under the third policy. The assignee’s policies, which were in effect for a period of 5%ths years, lapsed Jor nonpayment of the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Hemel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Coons v. Home Life Insurance Co. New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
- Johnson v. Anderson-Dunham Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Finley v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Descant v. Adm'rs of Tulane Educ. FundSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- McKinney v. American Security Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Sumrall v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- King v. MasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.