Perkins v. Thornburgh
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, County of Yuba. The facts necessary to understand the points decided, appear in the opinion of the Court.
1ConcurrenceTerry, C. J.
This was an action to recover the value of certain personal property, seized and sold by the defendant, as sheriff, under an attachment and execution against one Carter. The plaintiff claimed the property before the sale; a trial was had before a sheriff’s jury, who found against Perkins; afterwards, the defendant sold the property and paid over the proceeds to the attaehing-creditor. In the Court below, the plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appealed.
1. The first point made by the defendant is, that the District Court erred in permitting the plaintiff, against the objection of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Bird v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Lee v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Schroeder & Evers v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
3Cited by16 opinions
- King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Lee Bros. Furniture Co. v. CramSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Indiana & Chicago Coal Co. v. NealIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Delfelder v. Teton Land & Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.