Legal Opinion

Sierra Club v. Bosworth

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 14, 2005No. CIV. 03-3572(MJD/JSM)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER

DAVIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The subject of this environmental action is the United States Forest Service’s (“Forest Service” or “FS”) Big Grass Project (“the Project”), which is adjacent to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (“BWCAW” or “Boundary Waters”), and which Plaintiffs allege violates the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and its implementing regulations, the National Forest Management Act (“NFMA”) and its implementing regulations, the Superior National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (“1986 Forest Plan”), the Endangered…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Habitat Education Center, Inc. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  2. Habitat Education Center, Inc. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  3. Fund for Animals v. NortonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. High Sierra Hikers Ass'n v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  5. New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API