Legal Opinion
Tomtom, Inc. v. AOT Systems GMBH
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 25, 2014No. Case No. 1:12CV528PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
This declaratory judgment action is a patent infringement suit. Plaintiff Tom-Tom, Inc. (“TomTom”),- the putative in-fringer of U.S. Patent No. 6,356,836 (“the '836 patent”) owned by defendant Michael *772Adolph, seeks a declaration that the claims of the '836 patent are invalid and that TomTom does not infringe any valid claim of the '836 patent, which purports to cover a method for tracking- data in a mobile Global Positioning System (“GPS”) unit. Defendant Michael Adolpfy (“Dr. Adolph”) not only opposes TomTom’s requést for a declaration but…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tomtom, Inc. v. AdolphCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- TomTom, Inc. v. AOT Systems GmbHDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Joshua D. Pennell v. The Cellular Connection, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025