Legal Opinion

Gunter v. Borden, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1996No. 2951133PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWLEY, Judge.

This is the second time this case has been before this court. See Gunter v. Borden, Inc., 680 So.2d 276 (Ala.Civ.App.1996). In November 1990, Dolly Gunter (the “wife”) sued Borden, Inc., d/b/a Meadow Gold (the “company”), alleging that Ernest E. Gunter (the “worker”), her husband, had suffered a fatal heart attack in February 19901 that was proximately caused by his employment. She requested dependent-spouse benefits. The trial court found that the heart attack was not caused by the worker’s employment and denied the wife dependent benefits.

The wife appealed to this court, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. City of Tuscaloosa v. HowardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tee Jays Mfg. Co., Inc. v. StultsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Tee Jays Mfg. Co., Inc. v. StultsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API