Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Peterson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*70SABERS, Justice

(on reassignment).

• [¶ 1.] In this divorce case, the trial court ordered David to pay $600 monthly alimony to Gayle. David appeals and we affirm. Additionally, the referee determined that alimony was not to be deducted from the income of payor Father nor included in the income of the payee Mother for the purpose of determining child support. The trial court affirmed. We reverse and remand and hold that, for the .purpose of determining child support, alimony payments are deducted from the payor’s income and included in the payee’s income.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] David and Gayle Peterson were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hautala v. HautalaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Evans v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sommer v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Arneson v. ArnesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Christians v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Price v. PriceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Haanen v. HaanenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API