Harris v. Champion
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, all of whom were convicted of felonies in Oklahoma and were represented by defendant-appellee Oklahoma Indigent Defense System (OIDS) on their direct appeals in state court, brought suit asserting habeas and civil rights claims against defendants-appellees as a result of allegedly unconstitutional delay by the state in adjudicating plaintiffs’ direct criminal appeals. Plaintiffs alleged that inordinate and unjustified delay by the OIDS in filing briefs on their behalf and similar delay by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in adjudicating their…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Knox v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- F.E.R. v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Dunker v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.