Legal Opinion

People v. Antwine

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 2011No. Docket No. 297287PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The prosecution appeals as of right orders suppressing evidence seized from defendant’s home and the resultant dismissal of the drug and weapons charges against defendant. The prosecution argues that the trial court erred when it concluded that defendant’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated because police officers conducted a warrantless search of defendant’s condemned home that he was unlawfully occupying. We agree with the prosecution and reverse the trial court’s rulings.

We review de novo questions of law underlying a trial court’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Bond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. MahdiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People of Michigan v. Glorianna WoodardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Lavigne v. ForsheeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Long Lake Township v. Todd MaxonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Long Lake Township v. Todd MaxonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API