Legal Opinion

Aikman v. Evans

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1937No. 27171PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action commenced by plaintiff, J. W. Evans, to recover damages from the defendants, Thomas C." Vaughn and Claud E. Aikman, for breach of obligation to purchase an oil and gas lease. The action arose under the following circumstances: J. P. Harlin, owner of the land in controversy, gave G. C. Harris an oil and gas lease thereon, Harris agreed to sell the same to the plaintiff for $6,000. Plaintiff contacted defendant Vaughn, who was buying le’ases for defendant Aikman, and offered to sell the lease to him for $9,-000. Vaughn was then in Ada and he telephoned Aikman in Oklahoma City…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Harris Et Ux. v. ArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Jennings v. New York Petroleum Royalty Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Davis v. HolmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Creeden v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Petroleum Exchange Inc. v. PoynterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sohio Petroleum Co. v. BrannanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Garrett v. GerardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Mitchell v. SchmelzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. HARTLESS v. CLINECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API