Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Ryan
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 6, 2013No. CV12-0601-PHX-NVWPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are fourteen inmates housed in various Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC) complexes. Defendants are ADC Director Charles Ryan and ADC Division of Health Services Interim Director Richard Pratt. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Docs. 245, 248).1 The Court heard oral argument on Plaintiffs’ motion on January 25, 2013. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted.
I. Background
ADC currently incarcerates approximately 33,000 inmates in ten complexes statewide: Douglas, Eyman, Florence, Lewis,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- David Poe Wood v. Vernon G. Housewright, George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Holmes v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Dl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dunn v. DunnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Hernandez v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.