Oran Young v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is the fourth attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the sufficiency of the information charging that the petitioner did “enter” a state insured bank “with intent then while in said bank and therein to commit a felony * * *.” See Young v. United States, 294 F.2d 517, 10 Cir., certiorari denied 368 U.S. 979, 82 S.Ct. 484, 7 L.Ed.2d 440; and Young v. United States, 309 F.2d 749, 10 Cir., cer-tiorari denied 371 U.S. 964, 83 S.Ct. 546, 9 L.Ed.2d 511. This petition under § 2255 is based on the contention that the information does not allege that the petitioner entered the bank with the requisite…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- George F. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Godish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Oran Murray Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Oran Murray Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oran Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Oran Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Armour Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965