Legal Opinion

Oran Young v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1964No. 7541_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the fourth attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the sufficiency of the information charging that the petitioner did “enter” a state insured bank “with intent then while in said bank and therein to commit a felony * * *.” See Young v. United States, 294 F.2d 517, 10 Cir., certiorari denied 368 U.S. 979, 82 S.Ct. 484, 7 L.Ed.2d 440; and Young v. United States, 309 F.2d 749, 10 Cir., cer-tiorari denied 371 U.S. 964, 83 S.Ct. 546, 9 L.Ed.2d 511. This petition under § 2255 is based on the contention that the information does not allege that the petitioner entered the bank with the requisite…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George F. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Godish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Oran Murray Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Oran Murray Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oran Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Oran Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Armour Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API