Legal Opinion
Honolulu Lumber Co. v. American Factors, Ltd.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 29, 1966No. Civ. 2002PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
PENCE, Chief Judge.
On October 28, 1966, this court denied plaintiff’s petition to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis for reasons set forth hereafter. At the outset, this court is satisfied that the appeal has been taken in good faith.
I. Nature of Litigation
Plaintiff in this action is a domestic corporation incorporated in 1959 under the laws of Hawaii and formerly engaged as a wholesaler and retailer of lumber products in Honolulu. On November 30, 1961, plaintiff instituted this private antitrust action for damages against several of Hawaii’s largest corporations, which were direct…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bank of the United States v. DeveauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Case-Swayne Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Sunkist Growers, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Quittner v. Motion Picture Producers & Distributors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Atlantic S. S. Corp. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by12 opinions
- California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie BandaccariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Move Organization v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1988
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.