Legal Opinion
Scher v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 24, 2003No. CV995324DRHMLOPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Defendants have made a motion, pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 56, for partial summary judgment. For the reasons discussed infra, the Court grants the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
In this recitation of the facts, the Court relies upon the evidence identified in the parties’ Statements of Undisputed Facts, which are required by Local Civil Rules 56.1(a) and 56.1(b).
Plaintiffs initiated this diversity action on September 3, 1999, by filing a complaint. In that complaint, Plaintiffs allege that defects in Defendant’s pharmaceutical product resulted in serious personal injuries for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Robert J. Rule v. Brine, Inc., Also Known as W.H. Brine Company, and William H. Brine, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Susan A. Desiderio v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.