Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, P. J.

The above named cause is in this court as an original action. Relators are seeking a writ of mandamus against the Industrial Commission commanding it to grant a rehearing in a proceeding seeking benefits by claimed beneficiaries under the Industrial Commission laws.

The respondents have interposed a general demurrer to relators ’ petition.

Relators have filed a motion to dismiss respondents’ demurrer. This is a superfluous procedure, since the relators have the right to question the sufficiency of the demurrer, independently of their motion.

We shall treat the brief accompanying the motion as an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Jasionowski v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Becker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hoppe v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API