Legal Opinion

Van Camp v. Searle

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Orleans county. Action by Joseph Van Camp against Edward P. Searle, sheriff, and others. From a judgment determining the rights of the parties plaintiff and defendant, the Orleans County National Bank and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The purpose of the action is the determination of the rights of the parties, other than the defendant Searle, as sheriff, to the proceeds of the property of Benjamin Van Camp. He was treated as an absconding debtor, and, in more than 20 actions instituted against him, warrants of attachment against his property were issued, and delivered to Searle, the sheriff of Orleans county. Some of them were levied upon his personal property, and the others, and the most of them, were levied upon both real and personal property; and although, after the levy of the attachments, a large number of judgments…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Savacool v. BoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Hard v. LeurendusNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Martin v. HawksNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Anthony v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bloch v. BlochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Beardslee v. IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Burtis v. DickinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API