Burtis v. Dickinson
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Erie county. Separate actions by Sarah A. Burtis against Thomas V. Dickinson and Matilda B. Dickinson, by Charles D. Marshall against the same defendants, by Ludwig Nissen and Alexander C. Chase against the same defendants, and by the German-American Bank against the same defendants.
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term, Erie county. Separate actions by Sarah A. Burtis against Thomas V. Dickinson and Matilda B. Dickinson, by Charles D. Marshall against the same defendants, by Ludwig Nissen and Alexander C. Chase against the same defendants, and by the German-American Bank against the same defendants. From an order made in each case denying a motion to vacate the judgment therein, Ludwig Nissen, Emil Enopf, and John W. Buefer, members of and constituting the firm of Ludwig Nissen & Co., creditors of defendants, appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
BRADLEY,
J. The defendants, husband and wife, were engaged on March 27, 1894, as partners in the sale of jewelry at the city of Buffalo. On that day, judgments in the above-entitled actions were entered against them upon their confession, and executions upon three of them were issued to the sheriff of Erie county, who levied them upon the stock of goods, etc., in the store occupied by the defendants. On the same day an execution issued upon a judgment recovered by action against them by the Queen City Bank was also delivered to the sheriff, and by him levied upon the property. The execution…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thurber v. . BlanckNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Rinchey v. . StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- People Ex Rel. Cauffman v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In re BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Mechanics' & Traders' Bank of Jersey City v. DakinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.