Legal Opinion

King Logging Co. v. Scalzo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 16, 1977No. 1934-2PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

Plaintiff, King Logging Company, appeals from that portion of a Pierce County Superior Court judgment which denied it recovery of profits allegedly lost during the period of necessary repairs to a log yarder negligently damaged by defendants. Defendants cross-appeal from the award of damages for repair costs. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In September 1972 plaintiff owned a Madill log yarder, a specialized piece of equipment weighing several tons and having a value of approximately $105,000. Plaintiff, who had contracts with Weyerhaeuser Company to remove timber which had already been…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Holmes v. RaffoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Sledge v. . Reid, Sheriff, C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Jacobs v. BrockWashington Supreme Court · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells OrchardsWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Maehren v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. S. S. Kresge Co. v. Port of LongviewCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. United Truck Rental Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Kleenco Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API