Legal Opinion

State v. Derrah

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 2004No. 02010199; A119298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

In this criminal case, defendant was charged with manufacturing, delivering, and possessing a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, after a warranted search resulted in the seizure of approximately 50 marijuana plants at his residence. Before trial, defendant moved to controvert the affidavit submitted by Detective Welch in support of the warrant on the ground that his last name was repeatedly misspelled “Dennah” instead of “Derrah.” See ORS 133.693(2). Defendant also urged that the affidavit, as controverted, did not provide probable cause for the search. The court granted the motion to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. SlowikowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. ChezemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lia Lingo v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. State v. DampierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. AcunaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. KauppiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Lia Lingo v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API