Legal Opinion
Baetzel v. Home Instead Senior Care
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 17, 2005No. 1:04 CV 0119PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HOME INSTEAD, INC’S. MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WELLS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jolie Baetzel (“Baetzel”) brought this action pursuant to Title VII and Ohio state statutory and common law to remedy claims of sexual harassment, retaliation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful discharge against defendants Home Instead, Inc. (“Home Instead”), GEO Care, Inc. (“GEO Care”) and Geoffrey Moore (“Mr.Moore”). (Docket # 1). Ms. Baetzel was employed as a Community Service Representative for GEO Care, a franchise operation owned…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bricker v. R & a PIZZA, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Doreen Fuelling v. New Vision Med. LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Ries v. McDonald's USA, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021