Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1895No. 7166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Burt county. Tried below before Ambrose, «T.

1Opinion of the Court

Norval, C, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Burt county of removing mortgaged property out of the county, with intent to deprive the owners of the mortgage ■of their security. At the commencement of the trial the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence, on the ground that the information does not charge a crime, which objection was overruled, and an exception was taken by counsel for the prisoner. This ruling is assigned as ■error.

The information, after the usual formal averments, sets forth the charge against the prisoner in the following terms:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  2. People v. TownsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  4. Davis v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Lopez v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Luster v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Keyes-Marshall Bros. Livery Co. v. St. Louis & Hannibal RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Barker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ysac v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API