Legal Opinion

Boroughs Operating Electric Plants

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided October 23, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John Robert Jones, Dep. Att’y-Gen.,

The issue raised by your letter of Aug. 27, 1924, and your supplementary letter of Sept. 11, 1924, is whether or not boroughs, which, by virtue of legislative authority granted to them by the general assembly, own and operate electric light plants for commercial purposes, are subject to the provisions of section 23 of the Act of June 1, 1889, P. L. 420, and to the tax imposed thereby.

The pertinent portions of section 23 of the Act of June 1, 1889, P. L. 420, read as follows: “. . . and every electric light company, . . . incorporated or unincorporated, doing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Philadelphia v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Moore v. Luzerne CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. White v. City of MeadvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Philadelphia v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API