State of Arizona v. Samkeita Jahveh Jurden
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE BOLICK,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether multiple convictions under Arizona’s resisting arrest statute, A.R.S. § 13-508, that arise from a single, uninterrupted course of conduct constitute multiple convictions for the same offense in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. We hold that, regardless of the number of officers involved, § 13-2508 only permits one conviction when a defen dant resists an arrest in the course of a single, continuous event.
I.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In September 2012, Samkeita Jahveh Jurden walked into a department…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter JrArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Jorge Romero-Millan v. William BarrArizona Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. SozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.