Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. DOWELL CORP., a DIV. OF DOW CHEM.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1984No. 15167Published

1DissentStowers, Justice

The majority ignores the facts of this case and simply assumes that there is a latent injury. There is no latent injury in this case.

The following facts are undisputed. On August 12, 1980, the truck Smith was driving flipped over, crushing the cab of the truck. In his deposition, Smith stated that immediately after the accident he experienced substantial back pain and pain in a leg that caused him to limp for a week. More importantly, Smith stated, as the reason for seeking a physician’s attention about one month after the accident, that “[he] knew that there had to be something wrong because…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Casias v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Noland v. Young Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. ABF Freight System v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Gonzales v. CoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Letteau v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API