Legal Opinion

Kilgore v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. 86C-10766; CA A44424PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. The question is whether the judge at his original trial, who had previously represented petitioner in an unrelated matter, was legally required to disqualify himself on his own motion. We hold that he was not and affirm.

Petitioner contends that the judge at his original trial should have disqualified himself under Canon 3C(1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, which requires a judge to disqualify himself when his “impartiality might reasonably be questioned * * *.” The trial judge acknowledged in his affidavit that he had been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API