Legal Opinion
Schimmelpfennig v. Cutler
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 2001No. AC 20711PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FREEDMAN, J.
The plaintiff, Heidi Schimmelpfennig, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered on a directed verdict in favor of the defendant Cargill Chevrolet Company, Inc. (Cargill), and on the jury verdict in favor of the defendants Jarred Cutler, Robert R. Stalsburg and Stalsburg Express, Inc.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) directed a verdict in favor of Cargill, and (2) allowed the plaintiff to be questioned concerning prior bad acts or misconduct when the defense counsel did not have a good faith basis for inquiring about such issues, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Martyn v. DonlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Pedevillano v. BryonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baran v. Fojtik, No. Cv00-0502156s (Aug. 9, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Boscarino v. Jackson, No. Cv 99 0590885 S (Apr. 8, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Grossman v. Belville, No. Cv02-034 64 59 S (Mar. 3, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Schimmelpfennig v. CutlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Sheehan v. Donkor, No. Cv02-05 13224s (Jan. 6, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003