Legal Opinion

Gannon v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 25, 2018No. 113267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

*480 Article 6, § 6(b) of the Kansas Constitution imposes a duty on the legislature to "make suitable provision for finance of the educational interests of the state." On October 2, 2017, we ruled that the State had not met its burden of showing that its remedial legislation-2017 Senate Bill 19 (S.B. 19)-met Article 6's adequacy and equity requirements. Gannon v. State , 306 Kan. 1170 , 1172, 402 P.3d 513 (2017) ( Gannon V ).

We stayed the issuance of our mandate until June 30, 2018. We reasoned this gave the State ample time to satisfactorily demonstrate that its additional remedial legislation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. LaturnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Montoy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API