Legal Opinion

Palac v. Disanto

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1993No. 2827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a final decree awarding the Plaintiffs/Appellees,1 through adverse possession, fee simple title to a parcel of land claimed as the Defendants/Appellants’ property. We affirm.

The relevant facts as found below by the Honorable Lawrence A. Brown are as follows: The Plaintiffs-Palac and Sambrick each purchased lots on either side of the 50' x 166.5' parcel owned by William and Petronella Smolinski in 1951 and 1956, respectively.

On July 18, 1957, the Plaintiffs entered into a tripartite agreement with the Estate of Petronella Smolinski and a developer, Melvin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutton v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Tioga Coal Co. v. Supermarkets General Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Pistner Bros., Inc. v. AgheliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nikoula, J. v. Valerio, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API