Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. 319 Bragg Student Housing Auburn, AL LLC

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided September 17, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01018Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MADISEN ULRICH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case. No: 3:20-cv-1018-RAH-SRW ) [WO] 319 BRAGG STUDENT ) HOUSING AUBURN, AL LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER “Stop, look, and listen” has been the general rule in Alabama governing train collisions with pedestrians for over 100 years and has regularly served as a proximate causation hurdle for a plaintiff seeking redress against a railroad owner and operator. See Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Vincent,

66 So. 697, 698

(Ala. 1914);…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API