Legal Opinion

Seguin v. Remington Arms Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 16, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2442Published

1Opinion of the Court

SECTION “B” (2)

ORDER AND REASONS

Ivan L. R. Lemelle, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Precious Seguin (“Precious” or “Plaintiff’) and Defendant Remington Arms Company, LLC (“Remington” or “Defendant”). Rec. Docs., 151, 152. Both parties timely filed opposition memoranda. Rec. Docs. 154-1, 155. For the reasons discussed below,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 151) is GRANTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc; 152) is DENIED. ,

I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API