Legal Opinion

People v. Bender

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1933No. Docket No. 2196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

Defendants were indicted by the grand jury of Los Angeles County and charged with three distinct offenses of embezzling money. McCandless, appel lant here, demanded and was granted a separate trial. He was found guilty on all three counts and presents this appeal from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. It is the contention of appellant that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict of the jury on any of the counts, and also that the trial court erred to his prejudice in the admission of certain evidence.

It might be here noted that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. People v. FormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MarquisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. The People v. DonohueIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. ChristiansenUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API