Legal Opinion

Hooten v. Jensen

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 2006No. CA 05-742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

c obertJ. Gladwin, Judge.

Terry Hooten, special admin-JTVi jstrator for the estate of his deceased father, Sammy J. Hooten, appeals from an order of the Pope County Circuit Court denying his request that Sammy’s marriage to appellee Jacqueline Jensen (Jackie) and certain transactions made by Sammy be set aside on the grounds that he lacked mental competency and acted under the undue influence of Jackie. The controlling question on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm the circuit judge’s decision.

Sammy worked as a foreman for H.C. Price Company, which provided a pension plan for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Dent v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Looney v. Estate of WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Middleton v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Acuff v. BumgarnerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Black v. DuffieCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Hooten v. Mobley Law Firm, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Jack Bennett and Cindy Bennett v. Wiley B. BallowCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API