Legal Opinion

Grotefend v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1955No. Appeal, 127PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

In this action of trespass the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiffs against all defendants for damages to their automobile, and defendant-railroad appeals from the refusal of its motion for judgment n.o.v. The other defendants have not appealed. W. I. Worsham & Bros, were the owners, and Marlow the driver, of the tractor-trailer involved.

It is recognized by all parties that plaintiffs are without fault, but the railroad contends that there was no proof of negligence making it responsible in damages.

The accident happened at the Perry Street crossing of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Low v. Harrisburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Hoffman v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Guyler v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grotefend v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Marino v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API