Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire Fighters

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2004No. 74354-1Published

1Dissent

¶34 These days, fire fighters are not just men with hoses in hand and Dalmatians at their side. Yet while the legislature has clearly indicated that fire fighter is defined more broadly, the majority resorts to the dictionary definition of “fire fighter” to interpret chapter 41.24 RCW and to deny the respondents’ request for relief. I would look to the broader statutory scheme and closely related statutory definitions first, not to the dictionary, to determine the legislature’s intent. See State v. Borrero, 147 Wn.2d 353, 375, 58 P.3d 245 (2002) (Sanders, J., dissenting) (even when engaging…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BorreroWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BorreroWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Kennewick v. Board for Volunteer FirefightersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API