State v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appear from tbe City Court of Montgomery. 'Tried before the Hon. A. D. Satre. Tlie facts of the ease aite sufficiently stated in the ■opinion. cited E.r parte Knight, 61 Ala. 382; Tayloe v. State, 112 Ala. .69.; .Coyle n. Gommonmealth, 104 Pa. St. 117; Grey-ton v. Piper, 14 Incl. 182; Sinurr v. State-, 105 Incl. 123-;. Ex parte Strang, 21 Ohio St. 601; In re Lee, 5' Fed.
Read the full summary
Appear from tbe City Court of Montgomery. 'Tried before the Hon. A. D. Satre. Tlie facts of the ease aite sufficiently stated in the ■opinion. cited E.r parte Knight, 61 Ala. 382; Tayloe v. State, 112 Ala. .69.; .Coyle n. Gommonmealth, 104 Pa. St. 117; Grey-ton v. Piper, 14 Incl. 182; Sinurr v. State-, 105 Incl. 123-;. Ex parte Strang, 21 Ohio St. 601; In re Lee, 5' Fed. Rep. 912; Sheehan v. State, 122 Mass. 445; In re Delago, 146' U. S. 586; Ex parte Simmons, 62 Ala. 416; Ex parte, Brown, 63 Ala. 187; Ex parte State, 71 Ala. 371. The judgment of conviction is void and of no effect, and…
1Opinion of the Court
3ic£LELLAN, O J.
Appellee,. John Roberts, was-convicted on an indictment.charging the offense of robbery in the Tusca’oosa county court, and sentenced to-imprisonment in the penitentiary. Pie appealed to this court, and on 3Iay 11, 1900, his appeal was dismissed-on the ground that the record certified to us showed-that A. S. VandeGraaff, a person other than the regular judge of the county court, presided at the trial as special judge, and did not show affirmatively that said VandeGraaff had been agreed upon by the solicitor- and the defendant, or had been appointed by the clerk of said court…
2Cited by3 opinions
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Brand v. United States Car Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Ossie v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906