Byrd v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for rape; from Emanuel superior court — Judge Hardeman. January 17, 1922.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
Under an indictment charging rape, the accused cannot lawfully be convicted of an assault with intent to rape, if the evidence affirmatively shows that the offense charged was committed. Penal Code (1910), § 19; Welborn v. State, 116 Ga. 522 (2) (42 S. E. 773). However, in the instant case the evidence did not demand a finding that the defendant had committed rape, but authorized the verdict of assault with intent to rape. The court, therefore, did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
2ConcurrenceLuke, J.
Bloodworth, J., dissents.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Welborn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
4Cited by5 opinions
- Rich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Haney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Whiddon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951