Hicks v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P.J.
So far as the general grounds are concerned, we think that the case should be reversed for the reason that the evidence shows a completed act of rape. Code § 27-2508 provides: “No person shall be convicted of an assault with intent to commit a crime, or of any other attempt to commit any offense when it shall appear that the crime intended, or the offense attempted, was actually perpetrated by such persons at the time of such assault, or in pursuance of such attempt.”
Counsel for the State contends that, since the jury in this case was primarily concerned with the problem of credibility of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Welborn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Kelsey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Pack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956