Legal Opinion

Ashton v. Pall Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 15, 1999No. 9:96-cv-03870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SEYBERT, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Plaintiff, Igor Ashton (hereinafter “Ashton” or “Plaintiff’), commenced this action on or about August 5, 1996, against his former employer, Pall Corporation (hereinafter “Pall” or “Defendant”), alleging a claim of unlawful termination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”).

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Igor Ashton, was hired in or…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gross v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Tripp v. Long Island UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  3. Gulino v. Board of Education of the City School District of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Evans v. New York Botantical GardenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API