Legal Opinion

BATISTA v. AT&T INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 17, 2025No. 2:24-cv-08503Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOSHUA BATISTA, Civil Action No. 24-cv-8503 (JXN)(MAH) Plaintiff, v. OPINION AT&T INC., Defendant. NEALS, District Judge: Before this Court is Defendant AT&T Inc.’s (“AT&T”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Joshua Batista’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) (“Compl.” or “Complaint”) for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), and 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 8). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides this matter without oral argument…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API