Legal Opinion
Goodfriend v. Kansas City Star Company
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided January 17, 1958No. 11303PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNCAN, Chief Judge.
On September 24, 1957, plaintiffs instituted this suit under the provisions of § 15 Title 15 U.S.C.A. to recover damages for monopolizing and attempting to monopolize the dissemination of news and advertising in the Kansas City area. Defendants have filed motion to dismiss on the sole ground that the action is barred by the statute of limitations, § 15b Title 15 U.S.C.A.
The factual situation here presents a new question under the Federal Statute of Limitations. Plaintiffs allege that prior to January 7, 1948, they were engaged in the publication of a small magazine devoted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cardinal Films v. Republic Pictures CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Solinski v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. NisleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Frank Nisley, Jr., Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. John F. Wade, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. Howard Balsley, Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and Vanadium Corporation of America v. UnnamedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Philco Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Muskin Shoe Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- UNITED BANANA COMPANY v. United Fruit CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.