Legal Opinion

Cato v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 7, 2018No. 18-1645Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Federal Claims No. iS-i645 C Filed: December 7, 2018 ) CHRISTOPHER CATO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Pro Se; Sua Sponte Dismissal; Lack of ) Subject-l\/latter Jurisdiction', Claims v. ) Against State and City Officials; ) Civii Rights Claims; Toi‘t Clairns; Civil THE UNITED STATES, ) Rights Claims; Constitutionai Claims ) Defendant. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER SMITH, Senior Judge On October 22, 2018, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Compiaint With this Court seeking various forms of relief Plaintiff’s Complaint asserts, infer alia, that the State of Texas, the Houston Poiice…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API