Legal Opinion
K.M.L. Laboratories Ltd. v. Hopper
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1993No. CV-87-281PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEARIE, District Judge.
Plaintiff KML Laboratories Limited (“KML”) has moved, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56, for summary judgment on its rescission and breach of contract claims and for dismissal of the counterclaims by defendants Robert A Hopper, Jill S. Schneider, and Thomas P. Tobin (“Hopper Group”). Defendants have cross-moved for summary judgment against KML, certain KML officials, and an affiliated biomedical waste disposal company, Decom Medical Waste Systerns, Inc. (“Adams Group”). For the reasons which follow, the Court grants plaintiffs motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Helprin v. Harcourt, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. v. IMAGING DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re Arbitration Between Interdigital Communications Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.