Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Daly

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1940No. Civil No. 4161PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action by Anna Daly, hereinafter called plaintiff, to recover damages from George W. Pratt and B. J. Moore, hereinafter called defendants. The material allegations of the complaint, in substance, are as follows:

Plaintiff and one John Daly were husband and wife, living together in Tucson. In November, 1936, Daly was an habitual drunkard, and with full knowledge of this fact, and after warning by plaintiff of his condition, defendants continuously and repeatedly, and over the protest of plaintiff, furnished to Daly intoxi eating liquors. As a result thereof she was deprived of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  2. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. King v. HenkieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Moberg v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API