Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

C.A. Reuther and A.M. Diakatos v. Delaware County Bureau of Elections and C. Rossi

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 2017No. 1365 C.D. 2017Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

JUDGE COVEY

I agree with the Majority’s ruling that Christine A. Reuther’s and Ani Marie Dia-katos’ (Objectors) Emergency Petition for Relief Regarding the November 2017 General Election (Petition) seeking to strike Christine Rossi (Candidate) from the general election ballot was timely filed. However, I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s ruling that although Section 15.3(e) of the State Ethics Commission’s (Ethics Commission) Regulations (Regulation) is mandatory, it will not enforce the consequence of Candidate’s noncompliance with the law and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Snider v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. American Labor Party CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API