C.A. Reuther and A.M. Diakatos v. Delaware County Bureau of Elections and C. Rossi
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
JUDGE COVEY
I agree with the Majority’s ruling that Christine A. Reuther’s and Ani Marie Dia-katos’ (Objectors) Emergency Petition for Relief Regarding the November 2017 General Election (Petition) seeking to strike Christine Rossi (Candidate) from the general election ballot was timely filed. However, I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s ruling that although Section 15.3(e) of the State Ethics Commission’s (Ethics Commission) Regulations (Regulation) is mandatory, it will not enforce the consequence of Candidate’s noncompliance with the law and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Snider v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- American Labor Party CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.