Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Barnes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 15, 2012No. 12-08-00340-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BRIAN HOYLE, Justice.

Dr. Lee Roy Mathis brought suit against H.E. “Buster” Barnes alleging that Barnes damaged his property and asserting that Barnes’s conduct constituted a nuisance, trespass, negligence, and gross negligence. A jury determined that Barnes was not liable to Mathis, and the trial court entered judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict. We affirmed the trial court’s judgment with regard to Mathis’s claims of negligence and gross negligence, but reversed and remanded for a new trial on his claims of nuisance and trespass, holding that the evidence was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Amy Bolton v. George K. Fisher, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2017
  3. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon Gardiner, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  4. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon Gardiner, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  5. Henry LaBrie v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API