Hoofnel v. Segal
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This appeal is from a summary judgment granted to Appellees, Drs. James Segal and Susan Galandiuk, in a medical battery claim arising out of a scheduled surgery to treat Appellant Eva Hoofnel’s colorectal cancer. Even though Appellant admitted the medical necessity of removing her ovaries and uterus during the surgical procedure, Appellant alleges she did not consent for the removal of these organs.1 The Jefferson Circuit Court entered summary judgment in favor of Ap-pellees. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and we granted review. We affirm; however for reasons different from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Lugenbuhl v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Kovacs v. FreemanKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Vitale v. HencheyKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Lewis v. KenadyKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robert Shuler v. H. Edward Garrett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Chrissen Meade v. Stephen A. Schantz, MdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
- Glenda C. Johnson v. Dr. John C. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
- Hoofnel v. SegalKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Schulkers v. KammerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.