Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Sebastian Bridge District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 1942No. 4-6697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

In Sebastian Bridge District v. State Refunding Board, 197 Ark. 790, 124 S. W. 2d 960, this court said: “Since taxpayers of the Fort Smith area have paid more than fourteen hundred thousand dollars for a public bridge, and since acts 9 and 10' (of Special Session of 1938) were obviously intended as measures of relief to property owners, we think all bonds and interest maturing in 1938 should have been paid by the state.” And we further said: “It is our view that the language in act No. 10 (of 1938) pledging the state to pay 'all such principal and interest when due,’ was expressive of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Coco v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Sebastian Bridge District v. State Refunding BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. American Refrigerator Transit Company v. StroopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. State Refunding Board v. Sebastian Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. COUNCIL MANUFACTURING CORPORATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1967
  2. Good Canning Co. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  3. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Sebastian Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Sebastian Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API