Legal Opinion

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Sebastian Bridge District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1943No. 4-6972Published

1Opinion of the CourtGrieein Smith, C. J.

Decision calls for construction of part of Act 6, approved January 30, 1941, under which the Highway Commission assumed maintenance of the Arkansas river bridge westward from Garrison avenue, Fort Smith.

The Commission sued Sebastian Bridge District for an accounting, contending that because the State had paid $45,150 in discharge of the District’s bonded indebtedness, funds in the District’s treasury should go to the State for highway purposes, specifically to be used in the upkeep of bridges. See Sebastian Bridge District v. Refunding Board, 197 Ark. 790, 124 S. W. 2d 960; Refunding Board v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sebastian Bridge District v. State Refunding BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Sebastian Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Red River Bridge District v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. State Refunding Board v. Sebastian Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API