Legal Opinion
SUULUTAAQ, INC. v. Williams
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided December 1, 2010No. 3:10-cr-00048PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY M. BURGESS, District Judge.
Defendants Lance Williams, Center for Investigative Reporting (“CIR”), and the San Francisco Chronicle (the “Chronicle”) have moved for judgment on the pleadings requesting that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs Suulutaaq, Inc. (“Suulutaaq”) and Samuel Boyle’s claims for defamation. 1 For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Defendants related request for a hearing 2 is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Suulutaaq and the Section 8(a) Program
Suulutaaq is an Aaska Native Corporation (“ANC”) that pursues federal…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Higa v. KobayashiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Kerr v. Borough of PetersburgDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025
- McManus v. The Aleutian Region School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021
- Poffenbarger v. EquifaxDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
- Poffenbarger v. Key Bank Corporation, KeycorpDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023