Legal Opinion

Skolnick v. Altheimer & Gray

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1999No. Nos. 1—98—1543, 1—98—1544 consPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE O’BRIEN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Terry Robin Horwitz Kass, an Illinois attorney (Kass), and the law firm of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal (Sonnenschein) appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion to modify a protective order for good cause shown and directing that Kass’ counterclaim be filed under seal.

In June 1993, Kass and her then-employer, the law firm of Altheimer & Gray (Altheimer), made contemporaneous reports to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) alleging that another Altheimer attorney, Kenneth Skolnick, had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. In Re a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Chicago Council of Lawyers v. William J. Bauer, and Terence MacCarthy Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Skolnick v. Altheimer and GrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API