Wiggins Co. v. McMinnville Motor Car Co.

In this case we have not endeavored to state the testimony in detail, but have given our findings upon the general aspects of the testimony, reserving further detail to the opinion.

The first question arises as to the capacity of the plaintiff to bring this suit, but we think it fairly well settled, the amended complaint showing a judgment and the insolvency being practically admitted, that the plaintiff has sufficient standing to enable it *130to bring a creditor’s bill, although it has no lien by attachment. Nor do we think .the fact that it released its attachment before judgment constitutes…